Anyone want to help me ..

joanlawson
joanlawson Member Posts: 10,319
edited 1. May 2011, 08:41 in Community Chit-chat archive
Oh dear, Del, I think I'll pass on that one if you don't mind. :shock: What does Best Value mean anyway? As far as I can tell, it's a case of Big Society = more burden upon charities and less on public funds; responsibility-shifting; blame the public not politicians.

Good luck with it anyway :grin:

Joan
c1b3ebebbad638aa28ad5ab6d40cfe9c.gif

Comments

  • joanlawson
    joanlawson Member Posts: 10,319
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    a065.gifa065.gif

    Another rehab classic......the Best Value on the forum :!: :lol:
    c1b3ebebbad638aa28ad5ab6d40cfe9c.gif
  • NinaKKang
    NinaKKang Member Posts: 663
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    I'll read that if you will read and summarise Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service's Risk Based Integration Programme and it's Associated Values for me.

    I printed it and brought it home for the Easter holidays. So far, I've read a couple of lines of the introduction and put it down again... It's like wading through treacle.

    Nxx
  • livinglegend
    livinglegend Member Posts: 1,425
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Hi Del

    I will try to explain the concepts for you, it's pretty straightforward when explained properly.

    Firstly, there is a link between the value of dialectic capitalism and cultural rationalism. The subject is contextualised into a constructivism that includes postsemiotic theory as a paradox.

    If one includes cultural theory, one is faced with a choice: reject capitalist dialectic theory and conclude that context is a product of the masses, but only if constructivism is invalid. If that is not the case, reality is used to marginalize many voluntary organisations. Thus, we use the term ‘materialist textual theory’ to denote a mythopoetical paradox. If dialectic capitalism holds, we have to choose between class and precapitalist cultural constructivism. This gives us the inaugural paradigm of the genre of substructural capitalist theory of best value.


    Easy-peasy or what? b075.gif
    Josephm0310.gif
  • katekelly
    katekelly Member Posts: 975
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    I know we are a very intellectual lot on here but what the .........(add your own expletive here) hell does that mean!!!!

    In the words of Manuel "Qua?"

    Kate x
  • rugbygirl
    rugbygirl Member Posts: 691
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    I am with you on that one Katekelly. I thought it was hard learning German but after that I will stick with my German :grin:
    Jakib0644.gif
  • joanlawson
    joanlawson Member Posts: 10,319
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Joseph and Del, I won't be able to sleep tonight after reading your posts. I'm too worried about the mythopoetical paradox and the neosemantic precultural theory, not to mention the substructural capitalist theory of best value. Why does life have to be so complicated :?: Think I'll just order my brain transplant now :shock: :lol:
    c1b3ebebbad638aa28ad5ab6d40cfe9c.gif
  • livinglegend
    livinglegend Member Posts: 1,425
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    delboy wrote:
    That's all very well Joseph bit if one examines deconstructive postdialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept neosemantic precultural theory or conclude that the establishment is capable of deconstruction. It suggests that we have to choose between constructivist pretextual theory and textual socialism.
    And quite rightly too.
    Josephm0310.gif
  • carola
    carola Member Posts: 840
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Em,..... is this all saying that positive attitudes works wonders?