Hi, Welcome!

The community is a safe space for people living with and connected to arthritis to ask questions and share experiences. Get started by registering here and posting your first comment or question!

Sign In with a Versus Arthritis account

Help us improve our website, chatbot and online community
We’d love your help to improve our digital services. It’s important to us that our website, chatbot and online community continue to support and provide information people with arthritis in the right way. We’re excited to be doing research to understand more about what’s working for you and what’s not so we can continue to improve what we’re doing.
You don’t need to be familiar with our digital services or a digital native to take part. The research will take one hour and will be run by a research consultancy SnapOut. Simply fill in the survey below to get involved. Together, we can continue to do more for people living with arthritis.

Fill in this survey to take part

Hello :) ...frustrated newbie

floridakatfloridakat Posts: 2
edited 10. Apr 2014, 10:47 in Say Hello Archive
Hello

I am 41 and was diagnosed with 'Seronegative Arthritis' in February. I now realise, after reading the factsheets, that this is a generic term at the very least!!

The flare up happened almost overnight - I had had some swelling whilst on holiday and put this down to the lack of leg room on the flight. About a week after we came back my ankles swelled up noticeably and I went to the GP. He was a trainee and said he'd never seen anything like it and I had blood taken and was told to call back in a week.

I did this and was told 'tests are normal, you're healthy, no further action'. My feet and ankles were still swollen!

By the Friday of that week the swelling was very red and angry and after my cousin saw a picture (on FB as you do!!) she said she was concerned it could be celluitis and to call the doctor straight away. The GP asked to see me immediately and he said that he knew it wasn't that but it was either gout or something arthritic.

I had more blood taken on the Monday. The GP called on the Tuesday to say it was Seronegative Arthritis and prescribed steroids, codeine phosphate and naproxen. By this point to walk was horrifically painful and remember crying so much because the pain was so bad.

The steroids worked to reduce the swelling and I had got an appointment to see the rhematology consultant which I went to yesterday.

I feel I wasn't believed and it was a complete waste of over 2 hours of my time. He barely asked any questions, despite me telling him none of my other joints were affected he put me on the exam table and moved all my joints to check for pain. He then declared 'I think you have had an infection that caused the swelling and I know that your blood tests will come back normal. I'm not going to do any treatment so make an appointment for 6 months time but if there is any swelling between now and then call my secretary'.

Really???? Shall I call your secretary each evening when the swelling occurs (maybe you didn't hear that bit because you were so busy doodling!)

I appreciate that I probably don't fit into any 'normal' category - I don't feel the pain is horrific (I know I have a high pain threshold so a 2 for me could be a 5 for someone else!), I don't let it stop me doing the stuff I normally do but my back still aches, my ankles are 'uncomfortable' (this is noticeable) and I have to sit down more than I ever did, I have to take pain killers more regular than I have ever done, the ankles both swell most evenings but particularly when I have been very active (bizarrely ironing seems to have the worst impact!!) and I seem to get tired so easily.

I feel quite angry at the seeming lack of belief from the consultant.

Anyway, I read one of the 'fact sheets' on here this morning and it was like someone had taken my symptoms and written them down! Additionally my mother has recently been diagnosed with collitis and has a form of arthritis in her hands - the hospital refused to do a test for HLA-B27 when my GP requested it (because of the cost) saying it wouldn't affect my treatment....so I'm wondering if I should be pushing for this test again and would it help with a specific diagnosis?

I've dug out a book to keep a diary of symptoms, pain killers I take etc but wondered if anyone else had experienced anything similar and if so any advice re helping to get a specific diagnosis, help with consultant actually believing there is an issue (can I ask for a 2nd opinion?)

Many thanks for taking the time to read my (very long!) post and I appreciate any advice you may have to offer.

Thanks
Kate x

Comments

  • Sarah01Sarah01 Posts: 192
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Hi Kate,

    Welcome to the forum :)

    I'm afraid I have never heard of Seronegative Arthritis (I have osteoarthritis), I am sorry to hear that you were diagnosed with it.

    Having read your post I really feel for you and the problems you encountered with your GP and the consultant. I can understand your frustration with them. You are well within your rights to ask for a 2nd opinion.

    I wish you all the best and hope to see you around on the forum. It would be nice to know how you get on if you ask for a 2nd opinion.

    Take care
    Sarah x
  • dreamdaisydreamdaisy Posts: 31,567 ✭✭✭
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Oh boy, this takes me back. It took five years for someone to react to my ever-increasing left knee and I lost a one of those years being bounced between rheumatology and orthopaedics. After some time I was given the umbrella title of 'an auto-immune inflammatory arthritis' and, as it turned out, I do have a sero-negative form, psoriatic. This was not confirmed, however, until my skin helpfully obliged nine years in with a bout of pustular psoriasis on my palms and soles.

    There are around 200 kinds of auto-immune arthritis, it is not a matter of there's osteo and rheumatoid., end of. Rheumatoid itself can be either sero-positive (rheumatoid factor shows in the blood) or negative (it doesn't) or it could be something else. Diagnosis is very much a matter of trial and error and it can take time. At least they have acknowledged that there is something amiss (the first rheumatologist I saw dismissed me - I've proved him wrong!) and as a result of my late starts on the meds I have gone on to develop OA in a number of useful joints, plus something called fibromyalgia. There is a history of auto-immune troubles in both sides of my family, my Ma's specialised in asthma and eczema whereas Pa gifted psoriasis.

    It's good you have an anti-inflammatory plus stomach protector; the steroids should remove most of the discomfort but they do not tackle the root cause of the disease. They may stabilise things but it doesn't mean that things are better - I think you should seek a second opinion (I made huge mistakes in my early days believing doctors because up until then they had been right with everything else that had gone on with me since childhood) but now I know better. Please post again on the Living with Arthritis board on here because more people hang out there and you may gain more replies. I wish you well. DD
    Have you got the despatches? No, I always walk like this. Eddie Braben
  • Boomer13Boomer13 Posts: 1,931
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Hi Kate;

    DD has given you some good information here.
    dreamdaisy wrote:
    They may stabilise things but it doesn't mean that things are better - I think you should seek a second opinion (I made huge mistakes in my early days believing doctors because up until then they had been right with everything else that had gone on with me since childhood) but now I know better.

    I certainly understand your frustration and sadly, you are not alone in what you've experienced. The seronegative inflammatory arthritides can be hard to diagnose (and equally hard to live with :cry: ) and it seems some docs don't have much knowledge of them, as you have discovered.

    I have psoriatic arthritis/spondylitis and it took eight painful years to have it diagnosed but I have a very knowledgeable rheumatologist now so am finally on the right track for treatment. I am positive for HLA B27 but it really is an inconclusive test because it doesn't tell the docs if you have a seronegative disease, only that you have that tissue type and genetics. Many people who are positive (except AS sufferers) may never develop illness of these types and some have these illnesses but not the genetic type HLA B27. I was tested specifically because of back pain and a kyphotic upper spine hump but it has affected my treatment at all. I believe 99% of AS sufferers are positive but only ~65% of PsA suffers are, so it can provide a clue for docs but that's all. If you are negative, it doesn't mean you don't have a seronegative arthritis. Confusing, I know.

    I would say that you owe it to yourself to keep pestering the docs, seeking second opinions, and don't be lulled into "wait and see" mode endlessly. You will find a doctor that takes you seriously and looks for the correct medical answer.

    Best wishes,
    Anna
  • barbara12barbara12 Posts: 20,777
    edited 30. Nov -1, 00:00
    Hello Kate and welcome
    There are many people on here that have had to fight to get a diagnosis...including me 4years on..you really have to do your homework and the diary is a good idea , I keep one and take it with me to clinics..not that they always read it ..but \\\\\\\\\i take a shortened version and make them read it...I do hope to see more of you around the forum..
    Love
    Barbara
Sign In or Register to comment.