Ankle Fusion or Ankle Replacement??

sugarcaine

Hi all,

I am reposting this here as suggested by another member.

I am a 38 years old mother of 3 and have finally gained control of my rheumatoid arthritis with the help of anti TNF medication. My biggest problem now is dealing with the damage done before finding the right medication.

All of my issues revolve around my left foot/ankle. So far I have had a triple fusion on my foot. The problem now seems to have moved to my ankle.

Following recent consultation with my two different specialists it seems my next step is either fusion or replacement of the ankle. It seems the specialist I prefer is leaning towards ankle fusion due to my age and the fact I will wear a replacement out too fast. I already have mobility issues due to the triple fusion and I am now wondering what to do next. Will I lose much more mobility with a fusion? If anyone can give any opinions or advise I would greatly appreciated as I am not sure which direction to go! Thanks.

prefabkid47

Hi sugarcaine

Had ankle replacement in June 2011.Was also given the choice of replacement or fusion.Chose the former since was approaching retirement age and was not expecting to carry out highly physical activities.So far have had no problems.
Ankle fusion is suppose to be more robust and much longer lasting,though some say marginally more movement is lost and may be more susceptible to arthritis.How much mobility will be lost will no doubt be dependent on individual circumstances and condition of the joint.
Because of your 'tender' years I would personally go down the fusion route though of course the decision is yours based on your circumstances and the advice of your specialist.How much experience has the surgeon had of replacement since fusion is more common?
There are a number of threads on the forum from members who have taken either route (mine is under Ron's New Ankle).
Please let us know which you take.
Ron