Political Interviewers
stickywicket
Member Posts: 27,764
It seems to me that most of them are now more interested in their own questions than in the interviewees' (pardon the Americanism) answers.
I'm aware that, for years, politicians have dodged questions and answered the one they'd have preferred to be asked - or not answered at all (Remember Michael Howard with J. Paxman?) but I find the pendulum has now swung too far.
Many times, over the recent election campaign, I've been interested in what politicians of various hues and creeds were saying, only to find the interviewer interrupting and talking over them. I could forgive John Humphries yesterday for vainly attempting to get an answer on Tory policy out of Boris Johnson that didn't begin "Jeremy Corbin..." and I have some sympathy with those who persevere in asking a question, which is being evaded, by talking over a politician who is simply using the time available to get over a point that is entirely unrelated to the question.
But, surely, many of these interviewers now seem to have an exalted idea of their own importance. Paxo can be just plain nasty. Humphries is almost as bad. I used to regard Laura Kuensberg as a rottweiller but she seems to have mellowed a little. I think Evan Davies is possibly the best of the bunch but I've been really disappointed with the standards of interviews recently.
I'm aware that, for years, politicians have dodged questions and answered the one they'd have preferred to be asked - or not answered at all (Remember Michael Howard with J. Paxman?) but I find the pendulum has now swung too far.
Many times, over the recent election campaign, I've been interested in what politicians of various hues and creeds were saying, only to find the interviewer interrupting and talking over them. I could forgive John Humphries yesterday for vainly attempting to get an answer on Tory policy out of Boris Johnson that didn't begin "Jeremy Corbin..." and I have some sympathy with those who persevere in asking a question, which is being evaded, by talking over a politician who is simply using the time available to get over a point that is entirely unrelated to the question.
But, surely, many of these interviewers now seem to have an exalted idea of their own importance. Paxo can be just plain nasty. Humphries is almost as bad. I used to regard Laura Kuensberg as a rottweiller but she seems to have mellowed a little. I think Evan Davies is possibly the best of the bunch but I've been really disappointed with the standards of interviews recently.
If at first you don't succeed, then skydiving definitely isn't for you.
Steven Wright
Steven Wright
0
Comments
-
I totally agree SW..the worse one in my eyes is J Paxman..and his voice has gone up quite a few decibels.. :roll:Love
Barbara0 -
If there was more honesty between politicians and the public then interviewers wouldn't feel they had to get to the bottom of what politicians mean when they say something?
Politicians have only themselves to blame.0 -
I agree with you Stickywicket - they really do seem to think it's all about them!!
I do understand them not wanting to allow politicians to rant on and on about their own manifesto or put down other parties/politicians, but the whole thing is very frustrating for the interviewee and us too.
Maybe we ought to start a petition0
Categories
- All Categories
- 12.1K Our Community
- 9.6K Living with arthritis
- 776 Chat to our Helpline Team
- 393 Coffee Lounge
- 23 Food and Diet
- 223 Work and financial support
- 6 Want to Get Involved?
- 172 Hints and Tips
- 399 Young people's community
- 12 Parents of Child with Arthritis
- 38 My Triumphs
- 128 Let's Move
- 33 Sports and Hobbies
- 244 Coronavirus (COVID-19)
- 21 How to use your online community
- 35 Community Feedback and ideas