Has Anyone Had Combined Foot & Ankle Fusions?
Hi. I'm 60 - and after 45 years with flat feet (and with my consequently-distorted ankles being shored up with increasingly complex arch supports and - latterly - custom-made shoes), it now appears that to top it all off, my ankle joints have been invaded by arthritis. About four weeks ago, I began experiencing various relentless pains and a feeling that any shock-absorbing tissue in my ankles had gone on strike. From being able to walk around town reasonably comfortably, I now find myself only able to shuffle a short distance - and my ankles feel desperately fragile even when I'm resting up. If I didn't have a car, I'd be incapable of shopping, yet even the weight of a shopping basket held in my hand transmits itself through to my ankles and makes them howl. It's evident that I need some sort of surgery and soon.
I've not yet seen a consultant (I'm having to wait two months), but my GP is convinced that the only way to address the situation will be via fusions of both my ankles and both my feet. The last time I saw a consultant as opposed to an orthotist was about seven years ago and he himself told me then that when I eventually needed ankle fusions, I would also need to have foot fusions. The idea is that I would first have one foot-and-ankle fused, then have the other fused at a later date. But frankly, I can't see my way out of all this, because every aspect seems completely insurmountable.
Both my ankles are as bad as each other, so if I had one leg in plaster for weeks and had to support myself using crutches and my other leg, the ankle of that other leg simply wouldn't be able to take the extra weight and would be seriously injured within a day, leaving me completely helpless. I can't afford to go into a nursing home for the duration, nor do I have any family to look after me, nor anyone who could stand in for family. I wouldn't be able to use a knee scooter because I live in a very cold flat that's directly above the basement car park, so I have to have the floor covered in thick thermal-block underlay and heavy carpets, into which the wheels of a knee scooter would sink the moment I put my weight on it. Add to this the fact that I already have a back injury and arthritis in my hips and knees and you'll appreciate that not only am I not cut out for coping with a long convalescence alone, but even after the fusions have been consolidated, I'll struggle to cope with the additional strains which an ankle-foot fusion places on a person's knees, hips and back.
Bearing in mind how permanently incapacitated I'll be after a double foot-ankle fusion, it's tempting to imagine that even a double below-knee amputation would make more sense, because after all, prosthetic feet and ankles can flex. But of course the reality is that that sort of arrangement places even more strain on a person's knees, hips and back than a double fusion would, so it'd be unrealistic for me to contemplate it.
If my local foot-and-ankle specialist tells me that a double foot-and-ankle fusion is the only remedy, I'll be tempted to ask for a second opinion at a specialist hospital, just in case anyone can think of an alternative approach which might not leave me semi-crippled at the end of the process, but I fear that that's basically just wishful thinking on my part. After all, even an ankle replacement would neither straighten my foot nor guarantee an arthritis-free joint.
I must admit I'm scared to death of what the future may hold in store, because it's simply impossible to adopt a philosophical attitude towards all the many implications which surround the concept of a double foot-ankle fusion procedure. If I were 89 years old and already living in a care home, it wouldn't seem nearly such an impossible situation. But as a single person of working age with no family, the whole thing seems insurmountable to me.
Does anyone out there have experience of undergoing - and of supposedly recovering from - a four-in-one mega-fusion such as this?
Thanks for reading this.