ESA No Way!

Options
2

Comments

  • countessheather
    countessheather Non-active member Posts: 114
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    :D Well sue, we're waiting with baited breath, is there ANY good news?
  • theresa4
    theresa4 Non-active member Posts: 696
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    HI all
    Its awful what you are going through. When I had my nedical my GP was fuming as he felt they were disregarding his expertise on me his patient whom he sees often. When I got there I only had half the assessment as they had so many to do so i saw a nurse or health practitioner. She had me doing things which caused me so much pain I was sobbing, then sobbing from the humiliation of going through all the things I couldnt do for myself. Then on my next visit I saw a doctor who had a tick sheet asked questions made no notes then a report was formed. Several items were misquoted or just plain incorrect. :x Luckily I was down as limited capacity to work but in the work related group??? when I queried the mistakes I was told they didnt matter!! :? as I wasnt expected to work for the next 6 months but would need to attend work related interviews. I went to the WR interview and when the guy saw me on a particularly bad day he basically apologised and said it was a waste of his time but more importantly a waste of mine and obviously caused me distress and he would be putting a report in to say just that. :!:
    I am due a review shortly and am terrrified that they will change their minds as I am no better than before if not worse psychologically as I feel like giving up . Apparently I was bad enough to write off but because of my age they want to keep me iin limited capacity to work for a while to see if the meds ever work. THe money they give is not worth much but my mortgage insurance is invaluable and I worry if the DWP take me off then my mortgage cover would too. My GP is so supportive but I hate having my fate in others hands I already have little control over my life as it is.
    Good luck to all waiting.

    Theresa :)
    There are many things in life that will catch your eye, but only a few will catch your heart...pursue those. --Michael Nolan



    Theresa xxx
  • countessheather
    countessheather Non-active member Posts: 114
    edited 28. Jan 2010, 00:51
    So I take its a `NO'then sue? Theresa, I know I keep banging on about this BUT ALL OF YOU WHO ARE ARE RHUMY ARE COVERED BY THE DISSABILITY ACT OF PARLIMENT 1995/2005 AS EXCEMPT! Ok, what does this mean in the real world? Well at this moment as you all are experiancing NOTHING unless you challeng ATOS and the present GOVERNMENT. ATOS ARE JUST AN AGENCY, JUST A PRIVATE FIRM.
    HOW?
    Firstly, please can I ask EVERYONE to send an email titled`weflare reform act,ESA' to - radar@radar.org.uk.
    They are in direct consultation with the JOB SITE and GOVERNEMENT in `creating this mess' by thier insistance that `all disabled people should have a right to work' BUT I FEEL they are being MANIPULATED by these other parties as a MEANS TO AN END -by getting the top `disability rights campaigner' on board TO LOOK GOOD`- `Well, we covered our JAXI by consulting RADAR'ect.
    From what I can see they are `completely unaware' of what IMPACT thier involvement has REALY HAD upon disabled people. NEXT,WRITE AND TELL THEM WHAT YOU HAVE HERE! Pto -
  • countessheather
    countessheather Non-active member Posts: 114
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Also, ASK RADAR to take up your case and challenge the `powers that be'.
    NEXT. get FREE LEGAL ADVICE.
    Where?
    Google -DISABILITY RIGHTS SPECIALIST SOLICESTORS and get a `no win,no fee' to take on your case. I'm going to see if I can find a `solicestor who is going to do a LANDMARK case, representing us and challenging' this discrmination with the law.
    THATS why Theresa, you should NEVER have been put in the`work focused group' which means they are FORCING you to FIND WORK THAT WILL BE LOW PAID AND UNSKILLED - EXACTLY WHAT RADAR WAS TRYING TO STOP FROM HAPPENING IN THE FIRST PLACE! And if YOU DONT PLAY BALL THEY WILL STOP YOUR ESA AND MORTGAGE HELP- that means ALL OF US people!!!!!ATOS are using agency doctors from places like the Eastern Block Countries to do the assesments. And what makes a NURSE qualified to do these complex assesments????
  • tkachev
    tkachev Non-active member Posts: 8,332
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Hi Sue
    Havent replied to this thread before as I was lost for words.I think you are going to have to appeal.It seems they are pushing nearly everyone into appeal.I know it is a pain but dont let them deny you your rights.Good luck.
    Elizabeth
    Never be bullied into silence.
    Never allow yourself to be made a victim.
    Accept no ones definition of your life

    Define yourself........

    Harvey Fierstein
  • happy_feet
    happy_feet Non-active member Posts: 93
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Great post Countessheather. I have found a guide for the ATOS doctors doing the medicals and it is VERY interesting...

    "Observe the claimant's ability to rise from sitting and note the type of chair when they are collected from the waiting area. There is a further opportunity to observe this function following the interview.

    Record the claimant's ability to sit without apparent discomfort within the examination centre where this has been observed. Take great care not to give the impression in your report that the observed behaviour is the maximum that can be achieved."

    You may have the opportunity to observe how the claimant handles tablet bottles, their expenses sheet or a repeat prescription. You may also observe them lifting objects such as a pen or handling a newspaper. Fine movements may be observed if the claimant adjusts their hair or scratches their head. They may also adjust their watch or unbutton a shirt cuff for examination."
    Watch for hand, arm and head gestures. Note the ease (or otherwise) with which any coat or jacket is removed and replaced.
    The claimant may hang up a coat or a jacket allowing observation of shoulder joint and arm action.
    The claimant may lift their handbag or shopping bag several times during the interview process.

    In addition to the examination of the upper limbs as subsequently described, always inspect the hands carefully and document any evidence of ingrained dirt or callosities, indicating the possibility of some heavy domestic/manual work at some point in time"




    This is only a small part of it but you can see how underhand they are. If you can scratch your head does it mean youre faking your symptoms? Or does it mean youre capable of working a 40 hour week?

    And what bothers me most is the way these doctors lie. They obviously have to write a report of their own findings, like if someone scratches their head, adjusts their hair or whatever else they "catch" us doing while at the centre so why when we get the report of the "medical" is this left out? Do they not send the full report? All I got was the tick box report and on it were a couple of statements written by the doctor that were blatant lies.
    I think the doctors who lie in the reports are as much if not mostly to blame for whats going on. Something needs to be done.
  • airwave
    airwave Non-active member Posts: 579
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    I sometimes wish that I could have a say in this world, and it would be about the innocuous decisions taken by unthinking, uncaring civil servants, who, are just doing 'their jobs'.

    This government (careful, I might get carried away again!) has caused so much emotional baggage to be carried around by their supposed caring attitude to those less able.

    Who the hell should have to fill in 40 odd pages of medically and personally inquisitive forms, wait for weeks and be told the reverse of what is patently true? It is the forms and the method of seeking information from us that is undignified and wrong, not us!

    8) Its a grin, honest!
  • happy_feet
    happy_feet Non-active member Posts: 93
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Youre right Airwave. And another thing, the decision makers should be people who have some medical knowledge, I dont see the point of all the medical investigation and scrutiny for it all to be sent off to some faceless decision maker, who has absolutely no clue whatsoever about our conditions or us. Private medical reports should only be examined by medical people when what they decide is going to have such an impact on our lives. Who is an unqualified decision maker to decide we, our doctors and specialists are either liars or just wrong?!
  • airwave
    airwave Non-active member Posts: 579
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Perhaps our forthright and knowledgeable attitude should take a step forward to becoming a pressure group designed to stop governmental inadequacies having an effect on those with less physical abilities? Rather than sign up for the odd petition to come past our eyes.

    Perhaps we could show a government how to deal with us in a truly caring manner, despite them having spent all the money?

    We don't want charity, just the chance to live reasonably in what seems to be a (mis) information hungry government led by the unknowing and misinformed politicians!

    This is now blood boiling point and I'm going to have to go and stick a kipper in the microwave (for lunch)!

    8) Its a grin, honest!
  • salamander
    salamander Non-active member Posts: 1,906
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    My mother could lift her handbag but she couldn't cut a piece of fruit. She could scratch her head but she couldn't walk. She could read a newspaper but not carry a cup of tea. It seems that these 'observations' are based on the most simplistic of criteria. If you are disabled, chances are you make things easier for yourself by maybe not taking your coat off (mum sometimes didn't bother putting one on), not putting very much in your handbag so it isn't heavy, holding paperwork ready so you don't have to fumble about in your bag. You work out how to do things in a different way so it might look as if you didn't have difficulties doing them. My mother didn't go for the higher care rate and mobility because she was scared of losing the DLA she already had yet she could do practically nothing for herself over the last few years of her life and was surely entitled to more.

    My blood boils at the way our society treats disabled people. I think these humiliating tests are discriminating against them.

    Put bricks in your handbags when you go for your medical girls :lol:
  • airwave
    airwave Non-active member Posts: 579
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Put bricks in your handbags when you go for your medical girls :lol:[/quote]

    Sally,
    At last, some practical advice! You can take my place in the queue :P

    8) Its a grin, honest!
  • happy_feet
    happy_feet Non-active member Posts: 93
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Im with anyone who wants to start a group. We could try going for permission to see and correct any "mistakes" (untruths more like) before our report is sent off. At the minute we arent allowed to even look at what the doctor has written never mind sign to say its correct. :x
  • airwave
    airwave Non-active member Posts: 579
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Well, by the time you get to an interview, the agency should have more than enough information on you to last a lifetime, whether you scratch your head or not.

    Whether non-medical staff manning these agencies should be entitled to see and store medical information, I believe, goes beyond what is needed. Once a doctor or consultant says you are medically unfit to do something, surely that is enough, they don't need all the information that goes with it or to see you to prove it to themselves. Surely a consultant is medically qualified to do a task for a benefits agency whilst seeing you in the normal course of treatment? The pool of information available is huge, a simple report should do the trick.

    However, this is going off the point, which is that we are told that these systems are in place to protect society and assist claimants that are entitled, and that we need to fill in reams of poorly designed invasive forms that can only be interpreted by the officials who designed them!

    The system of caring is flawed, I think one of last years government 'in words' was systemically!

    8) Its a grin, honest!
  • annebr
    annebr Non-active member Posts: 730
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    I would be willing to join in some 'group' action. Not sure what we could do?

    Anne
  • airwave
    airwave Non-active member Posts: 579
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    annebr wrote:
    I would be willing to join in some 'group' action. Not sure what we could do?

    Anne

    Well, represent those with physical disabilities, ask for a voice on any action/governmental reform/guidance to those that make our laws/issue guidance to planning committees/be involved in planning consent/every part of our lives that is governed in any way. The greater the numbers the more representation we could get.

    Certainly, it is a long term aim and one which would take on a lot of knowledge in the first few years. Basically, be involved in decisions that affect us. The use of signed petitions handed into No. 10 Downing St. are small change, if everyone joined together, imagine the size of our voice! i haven't heard of anyone else doing it?

    8) Its a grin, honest!
  • suncatcher
    suncatcher Non-active member Posts: 2,174
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Hi im really sorry they have put you through this the whole system stinks. You are right in we should be preserving our own health not attending medicals etc we are treated as liers they have taken personal choice from us work is now forced on us. and it is not always possible . They have no clue to how we live.I would love to return to what i did before but i have not got it in me. What do they think we can do and will people give us a chance if we found something. I am so sorry you have been turned down. sending hugs and thinking of you from joanne
    Joanne
  • annebr
    annebr Non-active member Posts: 730
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    airwave wrote:
    annebr wrote:
    I would be willing to join in some 'group' action. Not sure what we could do?

    Anne

    Well, represent those with physical disabilities, ask for a voice on any action/governmental reform/guidance to those that make our laws/issue guidance to planning committees/be involved in planning consent/every part of our lives that is governed in any way. The greater the numbers the more representation we could get.

    Certainly, it is a long term aim and one which would take on a lot of knowledge in the first few years. Basically, be involved in decisions that affect us. The use of signed petitions handed into No. 10 Downing St. are small change, if everyone joined together, imagine the size of our voice! i haven't heard of anyone else doing it?

    8) Its a grin, honest!

    That would be a full time job! I do get involved where I can in issues that I feel are worthwhile. I have already written to my MP regarding DLA & ESA.

    I think this is something that perhaps the charities should be taking up with our support. The bigger the voice the more chance we have of them listening.

    No easy answers.
  • countessheather
    countessheather Non-active member Posts: 114
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Sorry to `bang on' again, but that is why I asked if everyone here could you,please,please email RADAR as it is `they' as the `charity of choice' that is involved in consultaition directly with the JOB SITE agency and the GOVERNMENT and are being used, to justify the change in the law, so that the `figures' are manipulated for the `forth comming'election. Welfare Reform is such a `hot topic' that I gurantee that this will be a fiece battle ground for voters. That dosent help you or I or other `disabled people' fiancially - we all know how expensive it is to be disabled and it certainly dose NOT help `re-train' all the disabled people into work that is relevant to them rather than `convienient' to politicians and statiscians. We do need `a pressure group'.It means we need to talk to ALL the other charities to unite. Wendy, I loved your posting and gentle Airwave you are inspirational. Keep copies of all paperwork connected to your ESA applicaiton and all letters to everyone one else. We only want a `level playing field' for disability without descrimintaion. xxx
  • annebr
    annebr Non-active member Posts: 730
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    I never noticed your earlier posting. I will drop an email to RADAR with my own experience for DLA.

    Anne
  • countessheather
    countessheather Non-active member Posts: 114
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Please title this `Welfare reform Bill' and many thanks for doing thxis - we can make a difference. :D xx
  • airwave
    airwave Non-active member Posts: 579
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    I have sent off an email asking for more information about RADAR and which organisations and charities are members of their campaign.

    They may be involved in making legislation but they seem to be hiding their lights under a bushel or two?

    8) Its a grin, honest!
  • jenzie06
    jenzie06 Non-active member Posts: 708
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    I'm very interested in starting/being involved with any pressure group or campaign to get this silly situation sorted.

    I have been in contact with my MP who wants me to go through the hoops before stepping in. He's very keen but will be retiring soon (due to OA!). The appeals process just seems to take months and months!

    I'm heading towards a tribunal (just waiting for them to send me a date) but I've supplied them with letters from consultant, GP, OT (who known me for almost 12yrs) and documents from my old work detailing how I tried to stay in work. Not sure how many letters it will take before it outweighs their one 'medical professional' who saw me for 20mins.

    I'm up for a fight!!
  • happy_feet
    happy_feet Non-active member Posts: 93
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Their way of thinking is "Not to focus on what you cannot do but to focus on what you can do" If you can do any of the tests at the medical it means you can get a job which involves doing something like what you did at the centre, something like washing potatoes in a restraunt, or packing biscuits in a factory. It doesnt matter what your past experience or qualifications are, youre capable of doing a job-any job.
    Ridiculous! And Im sure it doesnt go in our favour being able to get to the medical centre especially if its quite a distance.
    Having something like arthritis is bad enough in itself without all the hassle of so called medicals that are designed to make everyone fail. You literally have to be comatose to be exempt from one of these medicals and to be found unfit for work and thats no joke!
    Its making me so angry the stories Im reading and hearing there are thousands of them all over the internet, one man with no legs in a wheelchair was described as having walked from the waiting room with no problems! :shock:

    Im really not happy about these "Medicals" being carried out by people who havent a clue. Its outrageous that a decision can be made at the end of the day, with doctors and specialists reports ignored, by someone in a DWP office who has no medical knowledge and has never even met us. If someone has been diagnosed with something that impinges on their life and causes pain that should be evidence enough without the indignity of having to jump like a dog through their hoops.
    Whos for a group because Im in! I dont think petitions are the way to go, theyre being ignored.
  • woodbon
    woodbon Non-active member Posts: 4,969
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Hi, I know exactly what you mean about qualifications. I worked very hard to get my NVQs in Care, which are not the short, easier ones they have recently brought in, to up the number of staff in care homes with qualifications in care. I also have specialist qualifications in dementia care. Unless I go to the private care sector, which I am very reluctant to do, because only the 'not so good' ones would take me with my references, I can't work in my field. This is because Council, which mostly, here provide the best care facilities with the most trained staff, have retired me and opened my pension to the full amount I would have got had I worked to 65. I have old secretarial qualifications, but apart from the fact that office work using a keyboard, is not what the consultant at the hand clinic thinks I could manage, as I have damaged nerves in my arms.

    Also, during the medical, you only do somethin once, in real life, things are repeated time after time, no matter what you feel like. Bending once may be possible, but a whole day of wandering round, carrying things and bending could be far too much. I am marked as being able to carry shopping bags around, but, my doctor and physio have told me that is not advisable, even for a short distance and I do drop things when I do this. Oh, enough for now of my moaning, Love Sue
  • countessheather
    countessheather Non-active member Posts: 114
    edited 30. Nov -0001, 00:00
    Wendy I am always for a group! Airwave, found on the net early hours the `Disability Benefits Consortium' which lists a load of charities that have signed up - this is only open to orgs not us but we could approach them and all the others that are NOT listed. Woborn, I know exactly what you mean. I don't have the Physical stamina for `moving and handeling' and like you I came form the care sector. I did go for an interview last year for a `superviors' post with GUIDEPOST but, when I GOT THERE I WAS THE ONLY ONE AT THE INTERVEIW and as they had just moved offices, I took a sneek view at the `signing in book' to discover this. I thought It was odd that they called in a senoir manager from headoffice to interview me with the local manager whos team in [TEXT DELETED] I would be running. IT WAS A SET UP! They said nothing but I was used to full-fill thier leagal requirement that they had `advertised' outside of the organisation. When infact, they HAD ALREADY GIVNE THE POST INTERNALLY! Untill, the Empolyment Law is changed to `plug' this loope-hole, Employers will use every means possible to `not employ' disabled candidates as this is soooo much hassel and finance. H xx

    [Hi countessheather,
    I've removed the reference to a place name. It's worth bearing in mind that this is a public forum and we generally advise against including anything that might identify you in the real world. Nothing to worry about, just a precaution.
    Best,
    Moderator(T)]